U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Format

Send to:

Choose Destination

SRX9345989: GSM4849251: GTT24_T; Mus musculus; RNA-Seq
2 ILLUMINA (Illumina HiSeq 3000) runs: 23.5M spots, 1.4G bases, 546Mb downloads

Submitted by: NCBI (GEO)
Study: RNA-seq analysis of regulatory T cells in thymus, placenta, spleen and white adipose tissue of pregnant mice
show Abstracthide Abstract
In this study we performed RNA sequencing to determine and compare the transcriptome of regulatory T cells (Tregs) present in the thymus, placenta, spleen and white adipose tissue (FAT) of pregnant mice. We further assessed how the expression of the receptor Rank in the thymic medullary epithelia affects the transcriptional program of these Treg populations. For the isolation of viable and bona fide Tregs, we first generated RankWt (wild type control mice) and Rank?Foxn1 (which lack expression of Rank in the thymic epithelia) and further crossed them to mice that express GFP from the Foxp3 promoter. Neuropilin1 was used to mark the thymic origin of the Tregs. Equal numbers of Tregs (280 cells) were sorted as CD45-CD8-CD4+GFP+Neuropilin1High cells from the thymus and placenta of RankWtFoxp3GFP/GFP and Rank?Foxn1Foxp3GFP/GFP pregnant females at E17.5 (both samples from the same female; n=4 females per genotype). Thymus Tregs from non-pregnant littermate female mice for each genotype cohort were also studied. To increase robustness, the 280 placental Tregs were purified from 5 individual placentas per pregnant female (56 Tregs/placenta). Our study is the first one to determine the transcriptome of thymus and placenta Tregs during pregnancy and reveals that, partially dependent on Rank expression in the thymic epithelia, placental-resident Tregs are molecularly distinct from thymic Tregs. In a separate experiment with different pregnant mice than those used for thymus and placenta analysis, VAT Tregs (20-30 cells) and splenic Tregs (150 cells) were sorted (both samples from the same female) by using the same mouse lines (Rank Wt and Rank?Foxn1), embryological days of analysis (E17.5) and sorting strategies. Overall design: RNA-seq analysis of small, FACS-sorted cell pools. Affiliation: Magdalena Paolino, IMBA - Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences Affiliation: Josef M. Penninger, IMBA - Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences
Sample: GTT24_T
SAMN16517735 • SRS7568537 • All experiments • All runs
Organism: Mus musculus
Library:
Instrument: Illumina HiSeq 3000
Strategy: RNA-Seq
Source: TRANSCRIPTOMIC
Selection: cDNA
Layout: SINGLE
Construction protocol: For the generation of full-length cDNA, the Smart-seq2 protocol (Picelli, S. et al, Nat Protoc. 2014 Jan;9(1):171-81. doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.006) was used. The subsequent library preparation from the amplified cDNA was performed using the Nextera XT DNA library prep kit (Illumina). For sequencing, libraries were pooled, diluted and sequenced on Illumina HiSeq 3000/4000 using 50 bp single-read chemistry.
Experiment attributes:
GEO Accession: GSM4849251
Links:
Runs: 2 runs, 23.5M spots, 1.4G bases, 546Mb
Run# of Spots# of BasesSizePublished
SRR1288001412,504,731762.8M283.8Mb2020-12-03
SRR1288001511,014,957671.9M262.2Mb2020-12-03

ID:
12205401

Supplemental Content

Recent activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...